Don't simulate probing based on rtc event logs since we don't have that info logged.
BUG=webrtc:6217
Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2250963002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#13792}
diff --git a/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc b/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
index c9621f4..1db7672 100644
--- a/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
+++ b/webrtc/tools/event_log_visualizer/analyzer.cc
@@ -834,7 +834,8 @@
if (rtp.header.extension.hasTransportSequenceNumber) {
RTC_DCHECK(rtp.header.extension.hasTransportSequenceNumber);
cc.GetTransportFeedbackObserver()->AddPacket(
- rtp.header.extension.transportSequenceNumber, rtp.total_length, 0);
+ rtp.header.extension.transportSequenceNumber, rtp.total_length,
+ PacketInfo::kNotAProbe);
rtc::SentPacket sent_packet(
rtp.header.extension.transportSequenceNumber, rtp.timestamp / 1000);
cc.OnSentPacket(sent_packet);