| syntax = "proto3"; |
| |
| // These proto descriptors have at one time been reported as an issue or defect. |
| // They are kept here to replicate the issue, and continue to verify the fix. |
| |
| // Issue: Non-"Google.Protobuffers" namespace will ensure that protobuffer library types are qualified |
| option csharp_namespace = "UnitTest.Issues.TestProtos"; |
| |
| package unittest_issues; |
| option optimize_for = SPEED; |
| |
| // Issue 307: when generating doubly-nested types, any references |
| // should be of the form A.Types.B.Types.C. |
| message Issue307 { |
| message NestedOnce { |
| message NestedTwice { |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Old issue 13: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=13 |
| // New issue 309: https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/309 |
| |
| // message A { |
| // optional int32 _A = 1; |
| // } |
| |
| // message B { |
| // optional int32 B_ = 1; |
| // } |
| |
| //message AB { |
| // optional int32 a_b = 1; |
| //} |
| |
| // Similar issue with numeric names |
| // Java code failed too, so probably best for this to be a restriction. |
| // See https://github.com/google/protobuf/issues/308 |
| // message NumberField { |
| // optional int32 _01 = 1; |
| // } |
| |
| // issue 19 - negative enum values |
| |
| enum NegativeEnum { |
| NEGATIVE_ENUM_ZERO = 0; |
| FiveBelow = -5; |
| MinusOne = -1; |
| } |
| |
| message NegativeEnumMessage { |
| NegativeEnum value = 1; |
| repeated NegativeEnum values = 2 [packed = false]; |
| repeated NegativeEnum packed_values = 3 [packed=true]; |
| } |
| |
| // Issue 21: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=21 |
| // Decorate fields with [deprecated=true] as [System.Obsolete] |
| |
| message DeprecatedChild { |
| } |
| |
| enum DeprecatedEnum { |
| DEPRECATED_ZERO = 0; |
| one = 1; |
| } |
| |
| message DeprecatedFieldsMessage { |
| int32 PrimitiveValue = 1 [deprecated = true]; |
| repeated int32 PrimitiveArray = 2 [deprecated = true]; |
| |
| DeprecatedChild MessageValue = 3 [deprecated = true]; |
| repeated DeprecatedChild MessageArray = 4 [deprecated = true]; |
| |
| DeprecatedEnum EnumValue = 5 [deprecated = true]; |
| repeated DeprecatedEnum EnumArray = 6 [deprecated = true]; |
| } |
| |
| // Issue 45: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf-csharp-port/issues/detail?id=45 |
| message ItemField { |
| int32 item = 1; |
| } |
| |
| message ReservedNames { |
| // Force a nested type called Types |
| message SomeNestedType { |
| } |
| |
| int32 types = 1; |
| int32 descriptor = 2; |
| } |
| |
| message TestJsonFieldOrdering { |
| // These fields are deliberately not declared in numeric |
| // order, and the oneof fields aren't contiguous either. |
| // This allows for reasonably robust tests of JSON output |
| // ordering. |
| // TestFieldOrderings in unittest_proto3.proto is similar, |
| // but doesn't include oneofs. |
| // TODO: Consider adding oneofs to TestFieldOrderings, although |
| // that will require fixing other tests in multiple platforms. |
| // Alternatively, consider just adding this to |
| // unittest_proto3.proto if multiple platforms want it. |
| |
| int32 plain_int32 = 4; |
| |
| oneof o1 { |
| string o1_string = 2; |
| int32 o1_int32 = 5; |
| } |
| |
| string plain_string = 1; |
| |
| oneof o2 { |
| int32 o2_int32 = 6; |
| string o2_string = 3; |
| } |
| |
| } |
| |
| message TestJsonName { |
| // Message for testing the effects for of the json_name option |
| string name = 1; |
| string description = 2 [json_name = "desc"]; |
| string guid = 3 [json_name = "exid"]; |
| } |